--> /* end of banner manager 1 */

Stand Up For Seaton (SU4S)

Community Action for Seaton's Regeneration Area, 80% owned by Tesco - a floodplain on a World Heritage site bordered by nature reserves, tidal river, the sea and the unspoilt town. SU4S is a state of mind - no members, no structure, no politics. SU4S has objected to 2 planning applications by Tesco, including one for a massive superstore/dot com distribution centre which led to the recent closure on the site of 400 tourist beds with the loss of 150 jobs,a gym and pool - all used by locals.

Friday, March 16, 2007

Councillors attitude to development and how it affects votes

From the Financial Times -Distrust of councils and developers

By Tom Griggs

Published: March 13 2007

Housebuilders may be frustrated with local councils for their failure to grant planning permission for new developments, but most Britons distrust councils and developers for being in each others' pockets, according to a survey. It found nimbyism to be alive and well, with 83 per cent of respondents to a recent survey saying they wanted no more development in their local area, and 58 per cent saying that councils and developers were too close.

In addition, the survey said a councillor's attitude towards development was a key factor for 70 per cent of voters ahead of the council elections in May.

Nick Keable, managing director of Saint Consulting, which conducted the survey, said the message from the survey was clear.

"Those engaged in development, across all property sectors, need to stop moaning about how councils refuse their applications," he said. "They need to understand public opinion and then react to it by changing the way they operate.

"Councillors are not recruited from Mars," he added. "They simply reflect the wider public attitude."

The Housebuilders' Federation said the time taken for a planning application to be approved was excessive and the relationship could hardly be described as "pally".

4 Comments:

At 8:27 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How many councils agree in advance to sell key plots of land to Developers in advance of Planning applications and with no proper consultation or debate with those most affected ie. the local community?

 
At 10:08 pm, Blogger Fighting for East Devon's future said...

The sad answer to that is, unfortunately, quite a lot. It seems there is nothing at all to stop you doing this.

Judge and jury.

 
At 6:40 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Councillors are, generally, members of their local community. Therefore when they are told - firmly and often - that their community does not want a proposed development you might expect them to oppose it. If the application is in accordance with local planning guidance they may have to accept an application anyway. They do NOT have to do so when an application breaches local planning guidnace. When an application breaches planning guidance it should be refused. If it is accepted then it is inevitable that there will be suspicion of corruption.

 
At 8:14 am, Blogger archmaster said...

Unfortunately for us, the executive power on deciding local planning applications is held by councillors from across all east devon. The "local" interest is thus diluted.
Worse still is that the final advice given to these elected representatives comes from non-elected officers who may or may not, be operating to an agenda of their own and so might try to weight a decision at the extreme ends of any local plan.
How about this scenario:
Town A has a capacity of 3000 but the regional agency would like 3500 on it. Town B has a local plan for 300 houses of which 150 have been built, and land is available via a developer.
Regional agency pressures district councils officers (not the councillors) and together they come up with a plan for town B to take the extra houses, thus saving town A, and more important for the council, face.

Of course its just a scenario...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home