--> /* end of banner manager 1 */

Stand Up For Seaton (SU4S)

Community Action for Seaton's Regeneration Area, 80% owned by Tesco - a floodplain on a World Heritage site bordered by nature reserves, tidal river, the sea and the unspoilt town. SU4S is a state of mind - no members, no structure, no politics. SU4S has objected to 2 planning applications by Tesco, including one for a massive superstore/dot com distribution centre which led to the recent closure on the site of 400 tourist beds with the loss of 150 jobs,a gym and pool - all used by locals.

Friday, December 08, 2006

TD/Liatris plans almost available...

A visit here will take you to the documents relating to the Liatris/TD application.
SU4S (stand up for seaton) will be taking note of these docs over the next few days before we make any comment. You the public, are free to post comments at will here meantime.
The only thing we will note, is that, in the docs so far scanned, it appears that the vistors centre has now grown (topsy come home!) to 1500 sq metres, but we'll be looking at that before we comment on it as well.

The main immediate concern is the EDDC database allocating 29/12/06 as the deadline...will somebody at EDDC (hi boys and girls!) look into that and correct, that will only create a "you're rushing this thru" feeling, which is not a fair reflection of TD/Liatris who would welcome an extensive public consultation....they think there's been one....but let's not quibble right now, get the deadline set for objections to the end of January as promised, I'm sure Terry will post to agree with me. I'll allow his comments should he wish to post. No personal attacks, no defamation, no patronising, no editing, that's the deal Terry, just communicate with the concerned residents is fine.

A note to dial up users: some of these docs are quite large, it is probably better to either wait for the town hall to have available copies or view this site and links from the local library suite...book yourself an hour and take a notebook!

4 Comments:

At 2:29 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's happened to the Jan. 26th deadline? Who issued that one?
I assumed that it was EDDC.
Is this another case of left and right hands getting all confused?
Is it an example of the "misinformation" that has been bandied about?

 
At 2:32 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can not get the documents to load - they freeze. Another phoney "consultation"?

 
At 3:30 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have broadband. I have tried to access some of these docuuments but I think I'd have to wait until Christmas to get one. Not my connection at fault as I'm not having a problem with any other website. Not much hope for anyone on dial up/ trying to use a library computer.

 
At 10:31 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I note that the planning docs refer to agent Signet etc. Why the secrecy? Does EDDC know the real developers? I'm sure they must but shouldn't this information be in the public domain when dealing with public money? Transparency so the govt. keeps stressing. Would Persimmion or Bovis need to be so secretive. Why Why Why?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home