--> /* end of banner manager 1 */

Stand Up For Seaton (SU4S)

Community Action for Seaton's Regeneration Area, 80% owned by Tesco - a floodplain on a World Heritage site bordered by nature reserves, tidal river, the sea and the unspoilt town. SU4S is a state of mind - no members, no structure, no politics. SU4S has objected to 2 planning applications by Tesco, including one for a massive superstore/dot com distribution centre which led to the recent closure on the site of 400 tourist beds with the loss of 150 jobs,a gym and pool - all used by locals.

Sunday, December 17, 2006

Regeneration - Ground Conditions and Contamination

In the Environmental Impact Assessment it mentions that on part of the site there used to be a gas works with three gasometers (storage) and probably railway repair workshops associated with Seaton station, as well as 3 old electricity sub-stations. They mention potential contaminants such as Ammonia liquors, cyanides, pehnols, hydrocarbon fuels and pcb's - scary stuff. They say that contamination could be "moderate to high".

They mention that they took only five soil samples on the site (they don't say which part) which showed no evidence of contamination and that whatever contamination there is they think it is moving southwards (from the site towards the sea). They say that no ground gas investigations have been done. They say that they will do investigations later and decide on remedial works depending on the results of those investigations.

Is it usual to have an Environmental Impact Assessment that is so vague about possible contamination of a site? How can a district council make an informed decision about what and where to build on such a site if they don't have full information about it?

I don't know about Environmental Impact Assessments so I don't know if this is normal practice. Does anyone else know?

We have an organisation that will look at this Environmental Impact Assessment for us but it is still not available as a digital file. It is supposed to be available next week but until it is, they can't check it for us.

Anyone out there know how these things work?

1 Comments:

At 10:49 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gas Works, Electricity sub stations and engineering repair workshops are nortorious for being the most polluting of industries on what have now become brown field development sites. When these industries were operational environmental issues came way down the list of priorities.It was common practice for oil, solvents,paint in fact any scrap material to be dumped or tipped into the ground surrounding the site where given the likelihood of a thick clay substrata at Seaton it has lain undisturbed until...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home