--> /* end of banner manager 1 */

Stand Up For Seaton (SU4S)

Community Action for Seaton's Regeneration Area, 80% owned by Tesco - a floodplain on a World Heritage site bordered by nature reserves, tidal river, the sea and the unspoilt town. SU4S is a state of mind - no members, no structure, no politics. SU4S has objected to 2 planning applications by Tesco, including one for a massive superstore/dot com distribution centre which led to the recent closure on the site of 400 tourist beds with the loss of 150 jobs,a gym and pool - all used by locals.

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Axmouth harbour "development" and SU4S

Much has appeared in this week's local press about a possible development at Axmouth Harbour. Mention is made of a meeting attended by several local organisations (including Stand Up For Seaton) in February 2007 with the potential "developer". Since then, a "questionnaire" has been circulated by a local political party asking people in Axmouth if they are "for" or "against" development of the harbour into a marina.

You will probably also have seen a comment by the "developer" to the effect that he is sick of Seaton and its politics and, for him, the last straw was "when he discovered that a member of the Stand Up For Seaton campaign had been asking searching questions about the activities and probity of Worldwide Developments".

It is entirely true that the Stand Up For Seaton campaign has been asking such questions. It is entirely proper that these questions are asked of any and every potential and actual developer who wants to build in Seaton.

We want to know much more about this group which has indicated an interest in very widespread development in the town. If, as it says, it has an excellent reputation this will not be a problem.

Point us to at least three projects that you have done (preferably in the UK ) with major (not minor) public or private investors, give us the names and addresses of the groups and the name of the highest-level contact person in each of the groups that you worked with so that we can talk to them. Give us company accounts for the last few years along with a list of the directors of the company (or companies) that intend to be part of the development and a list of other directorships that they hold.

This is part of a process called "due diligence" which is central to the way projects are managed between parties who have not worked together before and is normal business practice.

We see the marina idea as a "concept" rather than a "project" and as such we have no view on it at all - many concepts make it no further than preliminary talks (which is what has happened here so far) and we would all be wasting valuable time making any decisions with almost no information.

Should it move from the concept stage to the project stage we would want a great deal more information than we currently have before we even began to think of making a decision for or against it. And, in making our decision, we would be guided only by what would be best for Seaton (and Axmouth). We are nowhere near that stage.

7 Comments:

At 1:51 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This so-called developer isn't actually a developer. If you read what he does in the View From - he is a middle man.

If he can't take the heat then he isn't suitable for this town.

If he has nothing to hide and only works with integrity then he won't mind SU4S talking to the people he lists on his website.......

At someone is out there checking up on these people. Well done.

 
At 4:46 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

In a way, the same could be said of Liatris, they have had the land, some of it the derelict caravan park, and done nothing for years....probably until they could get a price for it to a real developer.
They also dislike talking to the people who live here, the ones that have to live with the consequences of their greed.

 
At 10:02 pm, Blogger archmaster said...

I don't really accept the "final straw" narrative of events, there is nothing stopping anyone putting forward any planning application on any site, I think somebody was playing with the smoke and the mirrors too long;-)

 
At 10:14 pm, Blogger Fighting for East Devon's future said...

Smoke, mirrors and infill - the perfect recipe for disaster!

 
At 7:42 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There are considerable practical and environmental difficulties about locating a marina where these middlemen were interested in putting it. If they had much idea how to overcome them it has not come across in their publicity. A marina could be a beneficial development for Seaton but it would need to be done sensitively. It was perfectly proper to quietly look at who these middlemen were and if they had a track record of sensitive development.

The practical difficulties would reduce their profit - they would not be easily deterred if they saw a lot of profit to be made.

 
At 11:46 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

He doth protest too much me thinks.
Actually Shakespeares works could apply very aptly to many facets of these proposed Developments and plans.
Comedy of errors.
As you like it(or not)
and I am sure there are others.

 
At 12:12 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Message from Malcolm....
This is how it all appears to me:

Our council, (that’s district), is in bed with the devil,
They conspire and they plot as our town they dishevel.
They seem to think they can conduct many roles
as the planner, developer, and saviour of souls.

Their bed-mate Liatris, seems UNLIKE a friend,
They’ll exploit us for profit is the message they send.
And our gracious small town is about to be plundered,
So the wetlands project can be neutrally funded.

But what of existing facilities lost ?
They say that replacing would be too much cost,
when even more folk will be living in town,
to say we need less…. are the words of a clown !

 

Post a Comment

<< Home