Radio Devon Interview with Sandra
For the Radio Devon interview with Sandra click on the link on the right for the mp3 version.
posted by Fighting for East Devon's future @ 9:50 am
Saturday, January 20, 2007
Stand Up For Seaton?
What are we standing up for?
- 1. Regeneration not degeneration; a return to the original development brief
- 2. Community facilities for the whole town within the regeneration area
- 3. Seaton residents to derive the majority of the direct benefits from Section 106 payments
- 4. Real public consultation on all stages of the regeneration process
- 5. A *megamarsh* funded by external sources and not from Section 106 income from the regeneration area
- 6. The maximum possible amount of affordable housing in the regeneration area
- 7. The continuation of long-stay tourism on the regeneration site
- 8. A landmark Visitors Centre
- 9. A sustainable solution to flood water management in and around the regeneration area
- 10. A cutting-edge environmental approach to regeneration
Previous Posts
- The full text of the statement by Malcolm Bell of ...
- Stand Up For Seaton goes into hibernation - sorry,...
- South West Tourism and Seaton
- The demo - on ITV West Country News tonight
- IMPORTANT DATES FOR YOUR DIARY
- Don't you just hate it when .....
- Development Control Committee
- Sandra on BBC Devon tomorrow (Wednesday)
- What next? The alternatives
- A few quick things
Alternative stuff
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
5 Comments:
Four of us from the early morning gym session sat in our car to listen to you Sandra. Didn't you do well!!
Very upbeat. Very relevant. And enough time to get the message across.
Brilliantly done Sandra.
Thanks so much for being our voice.
Sandra, We all listened to this in our house. You have a lovely radio voice, and you got your point accross brilliantly.
Julia
x
Just listened on-line and thought it was excellent and very clearly put across. Well done and well done for the protest meeting this morning. Honor Blackman eh? Must find a recent photo!
you did very well Sandra - and "Li "atris lived down to their name again. Pity the journalists haven't seen his own flood risk assessment and don't know when Dinham is lying again. I've been reading about the "exception" test and wondering how the local authority think they are going to get past that one.
Anyone who has been too busy to write their own letter of objection yet might want to question the need for this development!
Sandra your argument was clear concise and to the point in stark contrast to the excusist and apparently deliberate attempt by the EDDC representative to obscure the truth.It must be so frustrating for you when probably even Jade Goody could appreciate the argument, that the authorities choose to attempt to marginalise and play down the vitally important issues at stake. If the decision came down to truth, honesty and plain common sense you would need to do no more, but of course that isn't the case and I hope the campaign is successful in avoiding this blatantly flawed Planning Application.
Post a Comment
<< Home